WIN or Get Huge Savings!
|
Infant Formula's Containing DHA and ARA oils from Martek Considered Unsafe
FDA Reports Indicate Infants Sickened from Algae/Fungal-Based Nutritional Supplements Source: The Cornucopia Institute Date: 03/09/2009
The Cornucopia Institute has filed a legal complaint with the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), demanding that the agency enforce the organic
regulations
prohibiting toxic solvents from being used in the production of organic
food. The Institute found that baby formula and other food
manufacturers are using hexane-extracted omega-3 and omega-6 fatty
acids (DHA/ARA) derived from algae and soil fungus.
Perhaps
more startling, through a Freedom of Information request at the FDA,
Cornucopia found algal- and fungal-based DHA/ARA have been linked to
serious side effects such as virulent diarrhea and vomiting in infants
consuming infant formula, many of whom required medical treatment and
hospitalization.
“The
federal organic regulations very clearly prohibit these oils in organic
foods, so this is not a case of companies finding loopholes in the
regulations. What we’re seeing is the latest in a long string of USDA
actions that blatantly cater to industry interests at the expense of
consumer safety,” said Mark Kastel, Codirector of Cornucopia. “USDA
officials are simply allowing these companies to freely break the
organic rules in their pursuit of profit,” he adds.
Organic
products with the prohibited fatty acid supplements include Horizon
Organic milk with DHA (Dean Foods) and organic infant formulas,
including Similac Organic (Abbott Laboratories), Earth’s Best (Hain
Celestial), and Bright Beginnings Organic (PBM Products).
Martek
Biosciences Corporation produces these DHA and ARA supplements. They
are extracted from fermented algae and soil fungus with the use of a
highly explosive neurotoxic petrochemical solvent, hexane. The
Occupational Safety and Health Administration lists hexane as a serious
hazard to worker health and safety, and the Environmental Protection
Agency classifies it as a hazardous air pollutant. The National Organic
Program strictly prohibits its use in the processing of organic foods
and ingredients.
“Only
a change in the regulations would make these oils legal in organic
foods, and a regulation change requires citizen input,” said David Cox,
a lawyer with the Columbus, Ohio law firm of Lane, Alton, and Horst.
“USDA officials do not have the legal authority to decide on their own
that they will not enforce the regulations, no matter how much industry
is lobbying or pressuring them.”
The
addition of DHA and ARA to organic infant formula is especially
troublesome considering that Martek’s oils are linked to serious
illness in some infants. “Through a FOIA request, we discovered that
scores of parents have notified the FDA that their infants experienced
symptoms such as serious cases of diarrhea, vomiting, and extreme
gassiness from consuming DHA/ARA formula, often requiring medical
intervention. These symptoms commonly disappeared as soon as the
infants were given regular formula without these supplements,” said
Charlotte Vallaeys, the author of Cornucopia’s comprehensive report
Replacing Mother—Imitating Human Breast Milk in the Laboratory.
While
formula makers claim to add these oils because they “support brain and
eye development,” scientific data to corroborate these claims are very
weak. “Results of most of the well conducted clinical trials have not
shown beneficial effects of DHA and ARA supplementation of formula milk
on the physical, visual and neurodevelopmental outcomes of infants born
at term,” according to Dr. Karen Simmer, professor in the School of
Women’s and Infant’s Health at the University of Western Australia.
Breast-feeding
advocates worldwide contend that DHA and ARA appear to be added
primarily as marketing tools. DHA and ARA supplementation adds
approximately $200 annually to the cost of formula, which is absorbed
by parents and publicly funded nutrition programs. Misleading claims
that DHA/ARA supplemented formula is now “as close as ever to breast
milk” also lead to the impression among many new mothers that formula
is now equivalent to breastfeeding, which may contribute to lower rates
of breastfeeding and higher formula sales.
“Adding
these two fatty acids to formula does not make it ‘close to breast
milk,’” said Jennifer Thomas, M.D., a pediatrician practicing in
Racine, Wisconsin. “Breast milk has nutrients, live cells, and
bioactive compounds that are absent from formula,” she added. “Formula
advertisements featuring DHA and ARA make it a lot harder for me, as a
pediatrician, to convince new mothers to breastfeed if they have seen
advertisements or labels implying that formula is just as good as
breast milk.”
But
the serious side effects experienced by some babies remain the most
pressing reason for keeping these oils out of organic infant formula.
Cornucopia has filed a Freedom of Information request to look into how
the USDA appears to have collaborated with lobbyists for Dean Foods and
others in secretly allowing these materials, despite their explicit
prohibition in the federal organic regulations. “It’s bad enough these
materials are being added to conventional infant formula,” said
Cornucopia’s Kastel. “This marketing gimmick has no place in organics,
where mothers are looking for the safest, most nutritious and natural
foods for their families.”
The
Cornucopia Institute, together with the National Alliance for
Breastfeeding Advocacy, has petitioned the FDA to require a warning
label on all infant formula supplemented with Martek’s DHA and ARA.
Currently, parents of infants who experience adverse reactions to
DHA/ARA formula have no way of knowing that these fatty acid
supplements may be the cause.
Few
parents know that Martek’s supplements contain only 40 to 50% DHA and
ARA, with the balance being sunflower oil, diglycerides, and
“nonsaponifiable” materials. Many of these components are not found in
human breast milk, and the triglycerides carrying DHA and ARA are not
identical to those found in human breast milk—and have never been part
of the diet for human infants. It is unclear why some infants cannot
tolerate these laboratory-produced DHA/ARA supplements. But the
evidence of side effects strongly suggests that more research is
warranted.
People can urge the FDA to require a warning label by clicking on this link and posting a comment with the FDA.
The
Cornucopia Institute and the National Alliance for Breastfeeding
Advocacy have also petitioned the Federal Trade Commission (FTC),
alleging that formula companies are engaged in misleading advertising.
The ads touting benefits to brain and eye development appear to be
based on shaky scientific evidence. Lawyers at the FTC had previously
warned Martek and formula companies about overstating the benefits of
DHA and ARA. In response to the petition by Cornucopia and NABA, the
FTC is currently investigating the alleged false advertisements.
Parents
and health care providers are encouraged to pass on reports of adverse
reactions to infant formula or food products containing DHA and/or ARA
to the FDA and to The Cornucopia Institute:
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
The
Cornucopia Institute also filed a formal legal complaint with the USDA,
calling for an investigation of Quality Assurance International (QAI).
QAI is the nation’s largest corporate organic certifier and has been at
the center of a number of other scandals in the organic industry, most
prominently the questionable certification of large factory farm milk
production. Cornucopia charges QAI with lax oversight and improper
certification of products containing DHA/ARA oils, including
questioning whether or not QAI is complying with the law and has the
technical qualifications to carry out their responsibilities.
The full formal complaints can be viewed at:
www.cornucopia.org/DHA/USDA_DHA_LegalComplaint.pdf www.cornucopia.org/DHA/USDA_QAI_LegalComplaint.pdf
Copyright 2007. All Rights Reserved. |
|
FREE Vitamix 5200 Contest!
|