WIN or Get Huge Savings!
|
Maternity Leave Linked To Fewer C-sections And Increased Breastfeeding Source: ScienceDaily Date: 1/8/09
Two new studies led by researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, suggest that taking maternity leave before and after the birth of a baby is a good investment in terms of health benefits for both mothers and newborns.
One
study found that women who started their leave in the last month of
pregnancy were less likely to have cesarean deliveries, while another
found that new mothers were more likely to establish breastfeeding the
longer they delayed their return to work.
Both
papers were part of the Juggling Work and Life During Pregnancy study,
funded by the Maternal and Child Health Bureau of the U.S. Health
Resources and Services Administration and led by Sylvia Guendelman,
professor of maternal and child health at UC Berkeley's School of
Public Health. The research takes a rare look into whether taking
maternity leave can affect health outcomes in the United States.
"In
the public health field, we'd like to decrease the rate of C-sections
(cesarean deliveries) and increase the rate of breastfeeding," said
Guendelman. "C-sections are really a costly procedure, leading to
extended hospital stays and increased risks of complications from
surgery, as well as longer recovery times for the mother. For babies,
it is known that breastfeeding protects them from infection and may
decrease the risk of SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome), allergies and
obesity. What we're trying to say here is that taking maternity leave
may make good health sense, as well as good economic sense."
The
study on the use of antenatal leave - time off before delivery with the
expectation of returning to the employer after giving birth - and the
rate of C-sections is the first examination of birth outcomes in U.S.
working women, the researchers said. It will appear in the
January/February print edition of the journal Women's Health Issues.
The
researchers analyzed data from 447 women who worked full-time in the
Southern California counties of Imperial, Orange and San Diego,
comparing those who took leave after the 35th week of pregnancy with
those who worked throughout the pregnancy to delivery. Only women who
gave birth to single babies with no congenital abnormalities were
included in the analysis. They adjusted for sociodemographic factors
such as income, age and type of occupation, as well as for various
health measures such as high blood pressure, body mass index, amount of
self-reported stress and average number of hours of sleep at night.
Using
a combination of post-delivery telephone interviews and prenatal and
birth records, the researchers found that women who took leave before
they gave birth were almost four times less likely to have a primary
C-section as women who worked through to delivery.
The
study authors pointed out that the United States falls behind most
industrialized countries in its support for job-protected paid
maternity leave. The federal Family and Medical Leave Act provides for
only unpaid leave of up to 12 weeks surrounding the birth or adoption
of a child.
The
bulk of studies on leave-taking and health outcomes from other
countries suggest that taking leave prior to birth can be beneficial.
The authors point to a macroanalysis of 17 countries in Europe that
linked failure to take such leave with low birthweight and infant
mortality. Rates of pre-term delivery were lower among female factory
workers in France if the women took antenatal leave, and a study
conducted in several industrialized countries found that paid leave,
but not unpaid leave, significantly decreased low birthweight rates.
According
to the U.S. Census, among working women who had their first birth
between 2001 and 2003, only 28 percent took leave from their jobs
before giving birth while an additional 22 percent quit their jobs.
Twenty-six percent of women took no leave before birth.
"We
don't have a culture in the United States of taking rest before the
birth of a child because there is an assumption that the real work
comes after the baby is born," said Guendelman. "People forget that
mothers need restoration before delivery. In other cultures, including
Latino and Asian societies, women are really expected to rest in
preparation for this major life event."
The
authors added that financial need may also deter women from taking
leave in the last month of pregnancy. Only five states - California,
Hawaii, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island - and the territory of
Puerto Rico offer some form of paid pregnancy leave, and none offer
full replacement of the woman's salary.
The
study on maternity leave and breastfeeding is in the January issue of
the journal Pediatrics. Using data from 770 full-time working mothers
in Southern California, researchers assessed whether maternity leave
predicted breastfeeding establishment, defined in this study as
breastfeeding for at least 30 days after delivery. Phone interviews
were conducted 4.5 months, on average, after delivery.
In
this study, women who had returned to work by the time of the interview
took on average 10.3 weeks of maternity leave. Overall, 82 percent of
mothers established breastfeeding within the first month after their
babies were born. Among women who established breastfeeding, 65 percent
were still breastfeeding at the time of the interview.
Researchers
found that women who took less than six weeks of maternity leave had a
four-fold greater risk of failure to establish breastfeeding compared
with women who were still on maternity leave at the time of the
interview. Women who took six to 12 weeks of maternity leave had a
two-fold greater risk of failing to establish breastfeeding.
Having
a managerial position or a job with autonomy and a flexible work
schedule was linked with longer breastfeeding duration in the study.
After 30 days, managers had a 40 percent lower chance of stopping
breastfeeding, while those with an inflexible work schedule had a 50
percent higher chance of stopping.
Overall,
the study found that returning to work within 12 weeks of delivery had
a greater impact on breastfeeding establishment for women in
non-managerial positions, with inflexible jobs or who reported high
psychosocial distress, including serious arguments with a spouse or
partner and unusual money problems.
"The
findings suggest that if a woman postpones her return to work, she'll
increase her chances of breastfeeding success, especially if she's got
a job where she's on the clock and has less discretion with her time,"
said Guendelman. "Also, women who are in jobs where they have more
authority may feel more empowered with how they use their time."
The
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends that babies be
breastfed for at least the first year of life, and exclusively so for
the first four to six months.
According
to the AAP, increased breastfeeding has the potential for decreasing
annual health costs in the U.S. by $3.6 billion and decreasing parental
employee absenteeism, the environmental burden for disposal of formula
cans and bottles, and energy demands for production and transport of
formula.
The
study authors noted that just having maternity leave benefits offered
by an employer was not helpful in breastfeeding establishment unless
the leave was actually used, indicating the importance of encouraging
the use of maternity leave and making it economically feasible to take
it.
"These
new studies suggest that making it feasible for more working mothers to
take maternity leave both before and after birth is a smart
investment," said Guendelman.
Other
co-authors of the paper in Women's Health Issues are Michelle Pearl and
Steve Graham, senior research scientists at the Sequoia Foundation, a
California-based non-profit organization focused on public health
research; Alan Hubbard, UC Berkeley assistant professor of
biostatistics; Dr. Nap Hosang, lecturer at UC Berkeley's Maternal and
Child Health program and a practicing obstetrician; and Martin
Kharrazi, research scientist supervisor in the California Department of
Public Health Genetic Disease Screening Program.
In
addition to Guendelman, Pearl, Graham and Kharrazi, the Pediatrics
paper was co-authored by Jessica Lang Kosa, research associate, and
Julia Goodman, former graduate student, both at UC Berkeley's School of
Public Health.
The
study published in Women's Health Issues received additional funding
from the Center for Health Research at UC Berkeley. The paper in
Pediatrics also received support from the UC Labor and Employment
Research Fund and the UC Berkeley Institute for Research on Labor and
Employment.
Copyright 2007. All Rights Reserved. |
|
FREE Vitamix 5200 Contest!
|